May 1, 2013

2 Comments

Mayday! GBPAUD +96pips / +4R / +2%

20130501gbpaudh4 s2b

 

The last couple of weeks have been relatively quiet trading wise. Compared to the first 3 months of shorting GBP and YEN the last few weeks have been positively dull.  Have people knocked off for summer early (I wish) or just taking a break after a manic first quarter?

Either way my trade frequency has been low but I took a long trade on GBPAUD yesterday which surprised me in its move. The GBPAUD is in a STAM 2 Buying environment (learn more about that here) so I was merely waiting to see if I had a trade set-up. Yesterday mornings 4 hour chart provided me with an entry and I placed a long order with a tight stop-loss.

The trade triggered and moved north – in an OK manner – what did concern me was the inability to close above the 21 MA and the bearish tails on the first couple of candles. Once the candles turned red later on in the day I expected the trade to fail.  I left the trade to play out over night but expected at best the trade would just whimper along because of the May Day public holidays or my tight stop-loss would mean I was stopped out.  thats ok – I’m alright with being wrong. It happens plenty of time.

Anyway I was surprised to check in this morning to find the trade a) alive and b) in profit  Furthermore when I checked in later in the day the trade had almost reached my target! I was dealing with a 10 pip spread on GBPAUD (yep – ouch) so wondered if that would be my downfall i.e. hot my target but not be taken out due to the spread.

Well I needn’t have worried. It would appear that people have been selling the Aussie today and that carried me over the finish line just after 1pm today. In fact as I look now it appears to have gone another 60 pips past my target.  That’s of no real implication for me as my trade worked out for +96pips / +4R / +2% gain.

Maybe this is the start of a good long summer?  I wont hold my breath.

Trade well,

Paul

April 26, 2013

2 Comments

26/4/2013 – Blink! The power (and the pitfalls) of instantenous decisions in financial markets – MarketTrader TV show

http://markettrader.tv/

MarkettraderTV interview

Last week I was fortunate enough to spend the day in Mayfair at the Westbury Hotel (a lovely location if you’re ever in need of one!)

The reason?  Myself and Malte Kaub from the Traders Leadership Council were delivering an all- day seminar for ActivTrades on ‘Blink! The power (and the pitfalls) of instantaneous decisions in financial markets’.

We spent the day explaining the background (from Malcom Gladwell’s book Blink!) and how we could use our trading actions and results to help us evolve towards consistency in our own trading. We made people aware of the need for expertise in any environment and about the impact of cognitive and heuristic biases in our decision-making.

It was a hugely enjoyable day and the feedback we received was tremendous.

We were also filmed and interviewed by MarketTrader.TV during the day and you can watch their report on the day by following the links for Market Programme 11. (You may even see me scrabbling my way through my first TV interview!)

Market Trader Programme 11

April 24, 2013

0 Comments

23/04/2013 Flash-Crash. How to lose (and re-gain) $136 billion in minutes and why we still need humans

So yesterdays market action was all about the Flash-Crash event that happened after (allegedly) the Syrian Electronic Army hacked into the Associated Press Twitter feed and posted a tweet regarding an attack on the White House and Barack Obama.

The S&P fell 1% on the news (allegedly wiping out $136 billion in gains) before regaining its previous level.

Image

The yen actually strengthened against the dollar by about 0.7%

Image

Soc Gens FX strategist Sebastien Galy’s takeaway from this episode is that “The market is very long equities and short yen”

What was interesting is that the market really crashed in those 1-2 minutes before AP put out a message saying they’d been hacked and that the tweet was erroneous  After that markets swiftly returned to previous levels very very quickly.  Who did that? I can’t believe it was program traders who did that? (If it was then please educate me, I’m happy to listen). No, it was humans who realised the error and then other humans who corrected the market. Very quickly as well.  In this modern age of HFT where algo’s abound we perhaps think that the end is nigh for human traders but I still believe (especially on longer time frames) that human interaction is required and that they also provide an edge.

On the downside for human traders I watched a video this morning of a somewhat dubious trader telling people how you could have made a killing by following his system that gave you an entry signal right at the bottom of the crash. Yeah – right, like a) any one in Europe was around when it happened and b) during such a crash very few humans (especially private retail traders) would have had the ability or inclination to buy something that’s just crashed so hard. As always these things look perfect in hindsight.

So I suppose a bit of swings and roundabouts for human roles in the markets there.

Until the next flash-crash (you know there’ll be one soon), trade well!

Paul

April 15, 2013

0 Comments

15/4/2013 – April Gold Update Part 2!

Well, what a difference a few days makes!  I wrote a post on Thursday about price coming down to the 1530 – 1570 Support level. As you can see from the chart price crashed through that the next day and closed the week off at $1489! I’d love to say I timed my post to perfection but it was complete luck on my part!

 

goldweekly april update 2

 

Whilst I did think that the downtrend would continue even I was surprised by the strength and ferocity of the selling. And today it got worse! I was looking at support levels in the 1430 region and it sliced through them like knife through a butter!  The next levels for me were around 1334 and we started to see lows around 1335. That’s a drop of $226 over two days of trading!  Holy cowabunga!  That’s a massive move by anyone’s reckoning.

We shall wait and see what the rest of the week brings us. Should be interesting!

 

April 11, 2013

0 Comments

April 2013: A quick Gold update

Back at the start of December 2012 I wrote about a comment in the FT detailing the largest purchases of Gold by Central Banks in nearly 40 years and how this could be a contrarian sell signal for Gold  I thought I’d do a quick follow-up with a chart to see how gold has fared since then.

ImageThis is a weekly chart of gold (apologies for the mess and scale – that’s due to wordpresses limits) which shows a continued down trend for most of 2013 in Gold.

We’re back into the (wide) zone of support between 1530 – 1570.  Price has not closed below 1570 on a weekly basis since Christmas 2011. There’s certainly been a lot of moves down to the bottom end of that range (1530ish) but never a close, leading us to believe there to be strong support there. Now price is once again back down there (1539) but was unable to close below the 1570 level last week.

If it were to break that support then I see 1430-1450 as the next level of support. If it bounces then I want to see closes above 1630 at least before moves above 1670 and 1700.  Personally I think we’re more likely to experience the former.

As always we shall wait and see and let the market play its hand.

March 25, 2013

0 Comments

Iraq War – 10 Years On. Still shock and no awe. A personal perspective

blair dodgy deal

This last week or so has seen us remember* the 10th Anniversary of the Second Iraq War.  (* I’m not really sure that the word ‘celebrate’ would be the right word to use in this context.) It’s been interesting to read the views of people ten years on. I would ask you the reader to please indulge me as I offer my own perspective as a trader and an ex-military guy who’s friends took part in this war.

Naturally as Traders we know how easy it is to be right in hindsight and how difficult it is to make decisions at the right hand edge of the screen as things unfold in real-time.  History can sometimes be unkind on Generals and politicians who had to make decisions at the time based on incomplete evidence.  However I believe in this situation, the case for war in Iraq, there was a very real narrative before hand that this was a flawed plan and war was going to happen for all the wrong reasons.  It was clear that the invasion of Iraq was part of a bigger agenda and that the reasons for war given to us were at best, weak, at worst, downright fraudulent.

When someone holds the largest ever anti-war rally in the history of the world you know something is wrong.  When your main allies of Canada, New Zealand, Germany, France all choose not to follow the US/UK into war then something is up. When your main regional neighbours/players Saudi Arabia and Turkey remove their support and not even provide tacit physical and military support for the war then you know something is wrong.

iraq wmd

As for the case of WMD’s at the time I was open minded. I wasn’t open to the Intel but I knew that Saddam had ‘form’ when it came to using chemical weapons and I know that any organisation (in this case the Hussein/ Baath party infrastructure) will do anything in its means to ensure its survival so it was plausible that there ‘ may’ have been chemical weapons and that they ‘could’ be used. However any one with half a brain knew that really the WMD piece was just another element that was being manipulated to encourage the case for war.

I spent the first night of the Air War (known as Operation Telic for British Forces) having a few drinks in a bar watching the build-up and the news unfold.  I had very mixed feelings about it all.  On the downside I was struggling with my decision to turn down the offer to return to the military to engage in what was pitched to me as “my generations great adventure”.  Whilst I may not have agreed with the strategic reasons for the war, part of me desperately wanted to be there and be involved. Most of my best friends were out there on their squadrons and I was struggling with coming to terms with my decision to turn down the RAF’s ‘once in a career opportunity’ to re-enlist. (Despite my reservations about the cause and reason for war I have every respect and admiration for the young men and women who carried out their orders and executed the tactical plan.)

The other downside of being in that bar drowning my sorrows?  I missed out on a hot date with a gorgeous blonde girl called Rachel. C’est la vie.

The upside of being in that bar drowning my sorrows? I ended up buying both the FTSE and Oil next day on a spread-bet.  Did I have some great trading strategy or marvelous insight? No, not at all. Did I know at the time that I would be picking the bottom of the post dot-com crash? Once again  no, not at all.  I was just very, very lucky. I knew that markets hated uncertainty and that now the war was on we had an element of certainty and it would likely cause a spike in Oil prices.  Take a look at the attached FTSE monthly chart. There was big hi-wave / pin bar candle for Mar 2003, after a couple of bearish years , the market reversed, turned bullish  and never looked back until the GFC of 2008. (The weekly and daily chart from those days is also worth looking at.)

gulfwar2 bounce ftse blog

The next upside was working from home the next day so I could watch the constant news feed. As soon as I saw what the Allies Day 1 war plan was, namely to secure the Oilfields in the north and south of Iraq , I knew that I’d made the right decision to not go back.

Laying my life down to defend a clear and present danger to my country? Yes, I’d have done it. Its part of the gig.

Put my life on the line to increase US access to cheap Oil whilst denying Chinese/Iranian access and making a healthy profit for shareholders and politicians? No, thanks. I think I’ll pass on that opportunity.

oil trader war

So what opportunities did come out of that operation for me?  Firstly when I watched the American rescue of Private Jessica Lynch, the American solider whose convoy was ambushed. She was injured and taken captive.  I noticed that in the footage of the rescue (courtesy of NVGs) that all the special forces had not only a pistol but a Tazer strapped to their leg. Once I saw that I realised everyone else would see that and what Special Forces used today the rest of the worlds, Armies and Police forces would be using tomorrow.  That made Tazr a buy.

taser

The other thing I noticed was that on every TV News footage of the war they always showed footage of Allied Jets and Helicopters flying over whilst they deployed chaff and flare counter measures.  (Makes for an interesting TV shot I suppose.) This got me thinking into how the Forces must be burning through their counter-measures stocks and that whoever supplied them would have a healthy order book. I did some research and found a UK company called Chemring (LON:CHG) that focused on countermeasures for the US Military. Yep, they were a buy as well.

helicopter flares

This is a good reflection of my investing style over my Trading style. Trading is all about rules, discipline, consistency and risk management. Investing , for me, is where my more discretionary, creative, intuitive side comes into play. I literally wait for a story to hit me (as in Tazr and the over-use of countermeasures) and then do some research. If the research backs up my intuitive reading of a trend / opportunity then I will invest.  I invest very rarely because opportunities that literally leap off the page at me come around rarely. I’ve learnt to trust myself over the years

So was it all worth it?  The US spent $60Bn and lost more than 4400 lives. The loss of Iraqi lives numbers somewhere between 10,000 and 100,000 depending upon your sources. We lost 179 lives and spent billions of sterling.  Was it worth it for my Forces friends? You’d have to ask them, I never do. I expect that cognitive dissonance would mean they’re unlikely to give a really straight answer. Are we any safer because of the war? Not noticeably.  Are the Iraqis? I suppose we should ask them, but I doubt it.  Progress has been interminably slow since the war ended.   There’s still a lot of this story to play out. (Dont even get me started on the CPA and the mis-use of all those UN/Iraqi funds!)  It maybe another 10-20 years before we see how it’s all turned out for us and the Iraqi’s.

March 22, 2013

0 Comments

10 THINGS I WISH I KNEW WHEN I STARTED TRADING courtesy of Stocktwits Brian Lund

I’ve mentioned many times before that it’s worth reading Brian Lund’s blog on stocktwits. I always enjoy his honest down-to-earth approach to trading discussion.  You’ll find several of his pieces re-run here simply because they’re very good and pertinent to a trader regardless of their level of experience.  This is another great piece by Brian which I heartily agree with and recommend you read and inwardly digest.  You can follow Brians work by clicking here: 

10 Things I wish I knew when I started Trading.

We all wish we could go back in time and relive the youthful parts of our lives, but with the benefit of our current hard-won knowledge.  God knows I do.

There are so many things I would do differently.  For one I wouldn’t have had those four extra shots at the high school kegger where I ended up puking my guts out in the bathroom for the rest of the night.  I probably would have bought $MSFT when they IPO’d.  And I definitely wouldn’t have blown off an awkward, gangly, pimple faced 16-year old Sofia Vergara when she once told me I was “el hombre mas guapo en todo el mundo.”

But hey, what can you do?

In an effort to help traders avoid some of my mistakes in trading, and since I am a giver, here are ten things I wish I knew when I first stated trading.

Complexity is your enemy

Take a look at almost any trading platform or charting software today and you will see more studies, indicators, and drawing tools that any one trader could ever need.  At the end of the day all indicators are a derivative of price and volume, so why get so fancy?  After many years of trying to find the “perfect indicator” I ended up with price, volume, S/R levels, the occasional trendline, and a couple of key moving averages.

95% of that other stuff is masturbatory narcissism by pseudo-quants who have to justify their own existence.  Unless you are on the Goldman Sachs trading floor or running your own hedge fund, keep it simple.

Work on specialization

I thought when I started trading that I had to be able to trade EVERYTHING.  That to me was the definition of a trader.   Some people can trade cotton futures, iron condors, and the dollar/yen cross.  I can’t, and it took me a long while to figure that out and shake off my self-imposed dogma.

Get good at one asset class, one instrument, or one issue, and once you master it (read: make money consistently), then incorporate something new into your repertoire.  Or don’t.   I know people who only trade $AAPL and make a good living doing it.

It’s okay to ask for help

At first glance trading seems like an activity for loners.  For people who want to sit in a room and stare at charts for hours on end.  And to be fair, there are quite a few of us out there that wouldn’t look too out-of-place on the front of one of those most wanted posters you see at your local post office.  But if you scratch the serial killer surface of most traders you will find someone who not only is willing to talk trading, but actually craves it.

For eight years after I took my first trade I didn’t talk to anyone else about what I was doing.  It was only when I stumbled across the Money Talk BB on the Prodigy network back in the early 90′s that I began to interact with others who were doing was I was doing.  And even then I was timid about asking for help.

Everyone knows that there is no “Holy Grail” trait when it comes to success in the markets, but I believe the thing that comes closest is the ability of a trader to have an open and honest exchange of ideas with other traders.  The more you do it the more you build your trading knowledge and the more you define yourself as a trader in your own right.

Learn to Ignore the narrative

I recently watched a presentation that Barry Ritholtz did at his “Big Picture” conference.  Besides the fact that he was saying how he felt that George W. Bush was the greatest President of the last century, the other thing that I found fascinating was his discussion about how human beings as a species need a narrative.  It’s part of our evolutionary DNA and the way before technology that we carried forth ideas, knowledge, and traditions from generation to generation.

The same phenomenon happens with market participants; they love to attach a story to a stock, using it as the justification for why it moved up or down, or didn’t move up or down.  This tendency will only cause you to lose money as a trader, and the faster you learn to ignore the narrative the better off you will be.

It’s not all or nothing

I have been all through the Trading Bible, and nowhere in it does it say that you have to put all your money to work in a position at one time.  Nor do you have to take your money out all at once.  Scaling in allows you to test the waters on your entry and add to your position only when a move goes in your direction.  Scaling out may even be more important as it allows you to lock in profits on positions which enables you to give them more room and be able to stay in for a greater move.

You will be wrong, a lot

Ted Williams was one of the greatest sluggers in the history of baseball, but he couldn’t get a hit 60% of the time he was at bat.  The hardest thing for most traders to get through their thick skulls is that being wrong most of the time is part of the game.

You will be wrong.  You will be wrong a lot.  A whole lot.  Embrace it. Learn to accept it.  As long as you cut your losses quick and maintain good risk/reward ratios on your setups you will make money over time.

It’s all about the Benjamins

This one may seem obvious but when I first started trading I was more interested in showing how smart I was by doing something most people didn’t understand.  I spent a lot of time telling non-traders about the markets and making myself feel important.

I bought books, software, and attended seminars because I thought it was cool to be a trader.  But all the while I was losing money in the markets.

Ask yourself this question, and be honest.  What’s more important to you, having everyone you know idolize you because you’re “trader”, but lose money, or have everyone think that you are just some schlub who works in an ice cream store,  while in fact you are really making a fortune in the markets?

Trading is ONLY about making money.  If you can’t do it on a regular basis you are not a trader.  Everything else is just conversation.

You won’t find answers in books

Books on trading, with rare exceptions, are for entertainment purposes only.  It does no good for you to read about how someone else trades because you will never be able to trade the way they do.  In addition, any ideas, concepts, or techniques that are taught in books are usually outdated by the time they are published because the markets are dynamic.  They are constantly changing, and like a flowing river, you can never step into the same one twice.

I can say for certain that my trading progress took a massive leap forward the day I stopped going to my local bookseller looking for answers on how to make money in the markets.

In fact there is only one book on trading that I know of that has solved the problem of keeping its content fresh and up to date.  It also happens to be free and you can pick it up here.

The reality is, you just don’t exist

Everyone has an ego.  We all suffer to an extent from illusions of self-importance. Problem is, the markets don’t just consider us unimportant, they don’t even acknowledge our existence. Nothing about our lives or what happens in them means anything to the markets.

Good person or bad.  Flush with cash or scraping by just trying to make your rent. Tall, short, pretty, ugly, it doesn’t matter one bit.

Did you stay out too late drinking with your buddies last night?  Is your mother dying of cancer?  Did your wife yell out “give it to me good Juan the pool-boy” the last time you made love to her?  All of that is as irrelevant to the markets as you are.  And if any of those things affect the way in which you approach your trading, the market will run you over like a freight train.

Everything you know about life is counter intuitive to the markets

From the time you are first able to comprehend “value” you are taught that cheaper is better.  If you want to buy a new refrigerator you wait for it to go on sale.  Then you try for a discount because they have discontinued that model.  And you get them to knock even more off because it is a floor model.  You want to pay the least you can because it is a wasting asset.

In the markets that is exactly the wrong thing to do.  A share of stock, option contract, or basket of currency is only worth what the next person will pay for it.  You buy strength and sell weakness.  You never average down and you pyramid up.  All-time highs are to be bought and all-time lows sold.  You sell good news and buy bad.

You have to understand that when you set foot into the world of the markets that the normative rules of value and worth, as well as your inbred ideas of consumer psychology no longer apply.

Hopefully these concepts will be helpful to you in your quest to be a successful trader.  Let me know which ones resonate with you and feel free to send me the things you wish you knew when you started trading.

March 19, 2013

2 Comments

The Traders’ Forum – Saturday 6th April – Central London

logo2

Fellow Trader,

You may have seen emails / details for an event I am organising / contributing towards. There is a special Traders Forum event taking place on Saturday, 6th April I and I have some very exciting news regarding the agenda for you.

We now have several guest speakers confirmed for the day including:

John Burford, whom many of you will know as the author of the popular Money Week Tradernewsletter

Ashraf Laidi, who is the Chief Global Strategist at City Index and is guaranteed to present his uniquely controversial view of the market

Neil Norton, a successful professional trader who will be sharing his specific strategies for taking regular profits from the market

Ghassan Chedid, a professional Hedge Fund Portfolio Manager and a member of the London Society Of Technical Analysts

In addition, Paul Wallace of the London Traders Network, will be discussing his upcoming new book on turning aroundyour trading performance and Kevin Barry, of the Traders & Investors Club, will be presenting his latest Market Roundup discussing the technical setups for his market positions for the month ahead.

With your support, we intend the Traders Forum to be the first of a quarterly event that will be geared towards the more experienced trader and investor. We are aiming to foster a kind of Mastermindenvironment, which will encourage a free exchange of ideas in a conducive environment with plenty of opportunity for networking.

The event will be held in a Central London hotel kicking off at 09.00. As well as the presentations, you will have the opportunity to speak with market professionals in person and to network with your fellow traders and investors. The agenda will be flexible, which means that you can pick and chose the presentations that you would like to attend.

Our mission is to bring you a memorable day in comfortable surroundings at a reasonable cost. Therefore, we will be holding the price for the day down to just £127, which will include refreshments, lunch, stationary and, hopefully, glacier mints!

Networking will be a very important part of the event so there will be a bar available to you throughout the day if you would like something more than coffee to fortify you. When we have worn out our welcome at the hotel, we shall continue the debates and discussion at a nearby hostellery. This is a great opportunity to spend a whole day in the company of market professionals and your fellow traders.

This event will not be recorded so when it’s over, it’s gone forever.

To secure your Ticket, follow the link here:

http://tradersforum20130406.eventbrite.com/

We are looking forward to seeing you on 6th April for a memorable day that is guaranteed to change the way that you see the market.

Warm Regards,
Paul

March 19, 2013

0 Comments

The stock market and the economy are two very different animals

I am re-publishing here a useful article from ‘Abnormal Returns‘ on the stocktwits website. It’s a good article and one that I have to constantly remind myself of. Namely that the stock market and the economy are two different animals. It’s easy to wander around a depressed high street and see the shops being boarded up and retail chains closing down whilst hearing tales of friends being made redundant and become a perma-bear.  This makes it even harder to understand when we see markets starting to claw their way back to pre GFC highs.  So I find myself constantly having to remind myself that the stock market and the economy are two very different animals and I should not let thoughts about one influence too many of my thoughts about the other.

Enjoy:

I think one of the hardest things for novice investors to grasp is the idea that the economy and stock market are two very different animals. In fact I start a chapter on Equities in my book Abnormal Returns: Winning Strategies from the Frontlines of the Investment Blogosphere with the title: “The Stock Market is Not the Economy.” There is ample data to show that a negative relationship exists between economic growth and equity market returns. What this relationship omits is valuation. Starting valuations have a big role in future returns, not economic growth.

This theme about the perceived disconnect between the stock market and economy has been touched on by a number of writers this past week.* Josh Brown at The Reformed Broker post-debate on the link between the two had this to say:

It’s a difficult concept to grasp when you’re trained to look for narratives and storylines as most journalists are. Steve is a very good economic reporter and brings a wealth of information to the viewers each time he’s on. I was simply trying to make the point that the Greek stock market had risen by 30% last year despite a contracting economy while in Shanghai stocks were down all year as the Chinese economy grew by 7%. Thus, the Economy ≠ the Stock Market.

Barry Ritholtz writing at the Washington Post has an article arguing not only does economic have a limited role in investor decision making but so do political machinations as well. Barry also notes the importance of valuation on decision making as well.

Most folks seem surprised when I tell them the sequester will have “little or no” impact on markets. The correlation between how markets perform relative to economic events is actually quite weak…Indeed, the correlation between economic noise and how equity markets perform has been wildly overemphasized. To quote Warren Buffett: “If you knew what was going to happen in the economy, you still wouldn’t necessarily know what was going to happen in the stock market.”

Peter Coy at Businessweek does not one feedback mechanism between the stock market and the economy. One that the Fed is hoping will happen sooner rather than later.

The stock market’s importance is more symbolic than economic. Only a handful of companies use it to raise money in a typical year, and most families have more wealth in real estate than in stocks. What higher stock prices do is signal to CEOs that investors want them to put their money to work. Farmer argues that rising stock prices may yet rouse dormant animal spirits and get the economy going again. If that’s so, then the Fed’s strategy will have worked.

Although not directly related to the earlier discussion I thought this piece by François Sicart at AlphaNow was interesting in that it delineates the differences between the goals of the entrepreneur and the stock market investor. They have very different outlooks and one shouldn’t approach stock market investing with the same attitude entrepreneurs bring to the table.

The primary goal of an entrepreneur is to create a fortune, in part by taking significant risk when necessary and when the potential return warrants it. The goal of an investment manager is to protect a patrimony against (or through) economic, political, or financial crises – as well as against the loss of purchasing power due to inflation. With the right discipline, this patrimony should also grow over time.

But the successful entrepreneur and the successful investment manager have different skill sets and instincts. Good judgment demands that one should not attempt to practice in the other’s field of excellence.

We want to believe the stock market and economy are inextricably linked. That is what the financial news industry is built upon. The economic indicator announcement is a staple of business TV. Maybe that is yet another good reason to go on a “news diet.”

*Although one could argue like Joe Weisenthal at Money Game does that the stock market has been moving in lockstep with initial weekly unemployment claims over the past six years.

http://abnormalreturns.com/the-stock-market-and-economy-are-two-very-different-animals/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+abnormalreturns+%28Abnormal+Returns%29

March 18, 2013

2 Comments

18/03/2013: EURUSD 164 gap down on Cyprus. Why we always manage risk first!

Just a quick chart to show the size and scale of the gap down in EURUSD last night based on the weekend news regarding the Cyprus bail-in/bail-out.

ImageThere has been less than half-a-dozen plus 100 pip gaps on the EURUSD in the last 4-5- years so this gap is significant and for anyone who was long into the weekend they themselves (like the Cypriots) would have taken a good haircut to their trading accounts.  It’s a fine example of why we always manage risk and never risk more than a small portion of an account on any one trade because you never know when such events might happen.

I’m sure everyone will have heard the news about the Cyprus situation and also some of the rumours that have been circulating. Such rumours as:

1. Angela Merkel wanted a 40% cut of bank deposits in a take-it-or-leave it offer that would punish Russian Mafia Money (and make her look strong to German voters in the run-up to German elections).

2. It was the Cypriot governments idea to include a cut of smaller sub-100k bank deposits in order to not alienate their Russian friends when they go back begging for more Russian money.

3. Russian energy firm Gazprom has offered to restructure the bank debt in return for exploration rights of Cypriot gas fields.

I have no doubt that in the time I’ve written and published this piece there will be a whole host more rumours. Its the latter rumour/offer that interests me most as it links into a bigger geo-political picture including Syria. It’s been well known for some time now that there are significant gas fields in the Eastern Mediterranean that are now viable (commercially and physically)  for production. This would present a boon to those Eastern Med countries and provide Europe with significant gas reserves. The biggest loser from this scenario would be Russia who presently provides a good deal of Europe’s energy.  The fighting in Syria has delayed the move toward production and as long as this goes on Russia continues to benefit from the war. There is no incentive for them to change their obstructive approach in the UN towards finding a settlement.  There have been tales of Russian warships ‘patrolling’ the Eastern Med to prevent meddling from a NATO/UN fleet (basically the US Navy’s 6th Fleet).

I have a soft spot for Cyprus having spent several of my summers in the 90′s based at RAF Akrotiri whilst conducting air-to-air gunnery exercises.  It was noticeable to me in the mid-to-late 90′s that we were beginning to see a Russian influx (they stood out a mile: badly bleached hair, far too much make-up, stone-washed denim jeans and dodgy fashion styles that were a generation out of date!) In those 15 years it has become Limossallograd due to the influx of Russian money and subsequent influence.

If the Gazprom offer is genuine and the Cypriots take the deal then it will have been a very smart move by the Russians. They will have side-stepped pretty much everyone.  It’s all part of what Rudyard Kipling introduced as ‘The Great Game’ which has continued in use to describe the geopolitical machinations of the Great Powers and regional powers as they vie for geopolitical power and influence in the area (courtesy of wikipedia).

I have no idea how this will all play out but the message for traders is always manage risk first and foremost!

Trade well,

Paul

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 958 other followers